Resources

The Upcoming Amendments to Singapore's International Arbitration Regime - Some Preliminary Observations

Calvin_Chan_-_Cropped_-_Resized

Calvin Chan*

Senior Associate,
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP & Affiliates

 


Arbitration practitioners and followers of arbitration developments in Singapore will no doubt be aware that the International Arbitration (Amendment) Bill 2012 ("(IA(A) Bill") has just been introduced for passage through the Singaporean legislative process on 8 March, 2012. The IA(A) Bill is expected to pass into law later this year, and is a refinement of an earlier draft bill that was circulated by the Ministry of Law last year for public feedback. The Bill reflects the ambition of the Singapore law-makers to keep Singapore's arbitration legislation at the forefront of international arbitral developments. In particular, its provisions on the emergency arbitrator procedure reveal innovation and foresight by the law-drafters in Singapore in addressing what clearly is a growing trend and practical need in international arbitration.

 


IAA 2012 Amendments - in Brief

The Bill primarily amends the International Arbitration Act (IAA) in four areas:

i.     Relaxation of the writing requirement in the IAA for arbitration agreements, by extending the IAA's application to arbitration agreements concluded by any means (including orally or by conduct or by other means), but whose contents are subsequently recorded in writing;

ii.      Granting Singapore courts the express power to review, at any stage of arbitral proceedings, not only 'positive', but 'negative' jurisdictional rulings by arbitral tribunals (i.e. that the tribunal does not have jurisdiction), and to make costs orders in this regard against a party;

iii.     Expressly empowering arbitral tribunals to award interest, whether simple or compound; on monetary claims and costs orders; and

iv.   Providing legislative support for the 'emergency arbitrator' procedure by according emergency arbitrators appointed under any arbitration rules the same legal status and powers as that of a conventionally-constituted arbitral tribunal, including the recognition and enforcement of such orders by the Singapore courts, whether made in Singapore or abroad.


Some Preliminary Observations

The IIA amendments relating to the writing requirement for arbitration agreements and the awarding of interest by arbitral tribunals are broadly consistent with international arbitral standards and practice, or otherwise in line with commercial realities. Both amendments are therefore relatively uncontroversial, and were generally well-received during the consultation process.

The same perhaps cannot be said of the other two amendments in the Bill concerning judicial review of negative jurisdictional rulings and the legal status of the emergency arbitrator, on which certain reservations were raised by some practitioners. The relative merits of such reservations, whether doctrinal or practical, are beyond the scope of this piece. What can be said, though, is that these two amendments reveal the pragmatic mindset of the Singapore lawmakers in adapting and even innovating legal mechanisms to meet the demands and needs of the arbitral process, and may even herald the beginnings of a "Singapore way" in the development of Singapore's arbitration regime, albeit one that continues to hew closely to the Model Law.

The amendment to permit judicial review of negative jurisdictional rulings departs from the current position under the UNCITRAL Model Law - UNCITRAL had decided, in its deliberations on the 2006 amendments to the Model Law, to exclude the right to judicial review of negative jurisdictional rulings. At first glance, the decision to depart from the Model Law may appear somewhat puzzling for a jurisdiction that up to now has been a faithful adherent to the Model Law. Indeed, the IAA adopts almost all of the Model Law without modification. Yet, as the report issued by the Singapore Academy of Law's Law Reform Committee had pertinently observed, on this issue there is no definitive international consensus. Issues of kompetenz-kompetenz, and the timing and ability of national courts to review jurisdictional decisions, are notoriously jurisdiction-specific. Whatever may be the implications of this amendment, it reflects the considered view of the drafters that this is a gap in Singapore's arbitration laws that needs to be plugged. When the IA(A) Bill is enacted, Singapore will join other arbitration hubs such as England, France and Switzerland, where the courts have the power to review, and in appropriate cases, overturn negative jurisdictional rulings by arbitral tribunals.

Of the four amendments in the IA(A) Bill, it is the legislative recognition and support of the emergency arbitrator procedure that are perhaps most note-worthy, and demonstrate Singapore's growing sophistication as an arbitral jurisdiction. Interim relief in international arbitration, including in the period before the tribunal is constituted, has become a significant issue in recent years, as evident from the 2006 modifications to the UNCITRAL Model Law. Access to pre-arbitral emergency relief is increasingly part of the international arbitration landscape, in addition to recourse to state courts and conventionally constituted tribunals for interim relief. At least five arbitral institutions now have "emergency arbitrator" provisions in their rules -- the International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR)'s International Rules, Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC), Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC), the Netherlands Arbitration Institute (NAI), and the recently-released International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)'s arbitration rules.

Yet, few if any notable jurisdictions have to date expressly legislated to provide legal recognition and support to the status and orders of emergency arbitrators. Likewise, the UNCITRAL Model Law currently does not expressly address the emergency arbitrator procedure. One reason may be due to the admittedly thorny questions surrounding the concept and status of an emergency arbitrator in the arbitration firmament, for which international consensus has yet to crystallise.

Such a perspective may, however, be missing the significance of the emergency arbitrator provisions in the IA(A) Bill. Under the IA(A) Bill, an order issued by an emergency arbitrator under any arbitral rules, whether in Singapore or abroad, will ordinarily be enforceable in Singapore. The decision by the drafters of the Bill to clarify that the orders of emergency arbitrators outside Singapore will similarly be enforceable in Singapore, which was somewhat unclear from a literal reading of the earlier draft bill, can perhaps be said to reflect the 'pro-arbitration' ethos inherent in recent IAA amendments,, most notably the 2010 enactment of Section 12A of the IAA empowering the Singapore courts to provide interim relief in aid of foreign arbitrations. That the Singapore courts are empowered, in appropriate circumstances, to extend judicial assistance to the international arbitral process accords with the well-established principles of international comity and transnational judicial cooperation, and bodes well for Singapore's continued development as a cosmopolitan arbitration jurisdiction.

 


Conclusion

It is no secret that the authorities in Singapore aim to be consciously responsive to developments and needs in the international arbitral process. The IA(A) Bill, in particular with its provisions on judicial review of negative jurisdictional rulings and the emergency arbitrator procedure, represents a further evolution of its arbitration regime, that in turn will serve to maintain Singapore's position as a leading arbitral jurisdiction.



* Calvin Chan is an attorney in the Singapore office of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, specialising in international arbitration. The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author, do not constitute legal advice and do not represent those of Skadden or its clients.


Download the PDFversion

 

 

Press Releases

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9

SIAC Announces the Official Release of the SIAC Rules 2016

30 June 2016SIAC Announces the Official Release of the SIAC Rules 2016The Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) is pleased to announce the official release of the sixth edition of the Arbitration Rules of the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (“SIAC Rules 2016”). The SIAC Rules 2016 will be available on the SIAC website from 1 July 2016, and will come into e...

Read more

SIAC Signs Memorandum of Agreement with GIFT

3 June 2016SIAC Signs Memorandum of Agreement with GIFT The Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) is pleased to announce that it has entered into a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with the Gujarat International Finance Tec-City Company Limited (GIFTCL) and GIFT SEZ Limited (GIFT SEZ). Under the MOA, SIAC, GIFTCL and GIFT SEZ will collaborate to promote the use of arbit...

Read more

SIAC Announces Appointment of New Registrar and Promotion of Deputy Registrar

27 April 2016SIAC Announces Appointment of New Registrar and Promotion of Deputy RegistrarThe Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) is pleased to announce the appointment of Ms Delphine Ho as Registrar of SIAC with effect from 20 May 2016, and the promotion of its Deputy Registrar, Mr Kevin Nash, to Deputy Registrar and Centre Director, effective 1 May 2016. Ms Ho wi...

Read more

SIAC Signs Memorandum of Understanding with Oe-Cusse Administration

28 March 2016SIAC Signs Memorandum of Understanding with Oe-Cusse AdministrationThe Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) is pleased to announce that it has entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with the Authority of the Special Administrative Region of Oe-Cusse Ambeno (SAROA) and Special Zones for Social Market Economy (ZEESM) Timor-Leste (SAROA-ZEESM TL), form...

Read more

SIAC Announces Record Case Numbers for 2015

25 February 2016SIAC Announces Record Case Numbers for 2015 The Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) is pleased to announce the official release of its 2015 Annual Report at the SIAC Annual Appreciation Event this evening. 2015 was a milestone year for SIAC. SIAC recorded the highest ever number of cases filed, highest ever number of administered cases and highest e...

Read more

Public Consultation on Draft SIAC Investment Arbitration Rules

1 February 2016Public Consultation on Draft SIAC Investment Arbitration RulesThe Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) is pleased to announce the commencement of the public consultation process on its draft Investment Arbitration Rules 2016 (the “draft IA Rules”), a comprehensive set of specialised rules for the administration of investment arbitrations by SIAC.The d...

Read more

SIAC Appoints New Court Member

1 February 2016SIAC Appoints New Court MemberThe Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) is pleased to announce the appointment of Mr Darius Khambata, Senior Counsel, to the SIAC Court of Arbitration with effect from 1 February 2016.Mr Khambata practises before the Bombay High Court and the Supreme Court of India. He has previously held two distinguished public law off...

Read more

Opening of SIAC Office in Shanghai

25 January 2016Opening of SIAC Office in ShanghaiThe Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) is pleased to announce the opening of a representative office in the China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone (FTZ). The launch of the Shanghai office underpins SIAC’s steadily growing popularity amongst Chinese parties, and is an integral part of SIAC’s continuous efforts to for...

Read more

Public Consultation on Draft SIAC Arbitration Rules

18 January 2016Public Consultation on Draft SIAC Arbitration RulesThe Singapore International Arbitration Centre (“SIAC”) is pleased to announce the opening of the public consultation process on its draft revised Arbitration Rules 2016 (the “draft Rules”). The revision of SIAC’s Arbitration Rules takes into account recent developments in international arbitration practice and pr...

Read more
You are here: Home Resources Articles & Publication Articles The Upcoming Amendments to Singapore's International Arbitration Regime - Some Preliminary Observations